The thermal conductivity of pure metals

As discussed previously in this section, the measurement of the thermal conductivity is notoriously difficult. The consequence is that, while the measurement accuracy by individual researchers is claimed to be of the order of 2%, laboratories participating in round-robin tests produce results differing from each other by 15% or more [1]. Even the measurement of pure metals is no exception to this role.

About forty years ago, the published values of Nickel and Tungsten, for example, varied over an order of magnitude. Supposedly a wrong value for Tungsten used to calculate proper thickness for thermal shields of early space vehicles led to fatal re-entry problems. The large discrepancies found in ‘early’ literature could possibly be attributed to small impurity levels, for which the thermal conductivity is very sensitive. People in search of the most trustworthy data could best consult the series of books by Touloukian et al. [2].

The thermal conductivity of pure metals shows a rather complex dependency on temperature, but, in our range of interest (0-200°C), its value usually decreases slightly with increasing temperature. In almost all cases of practical interest the temperature dependency can be neglected, with the possible exception of Nickel, Tin and Tungsten. The following table lists values of pure metals most commonly used in electronics cooling, at three different temperatures.

Source: Beaton and Hewitt

  Thermal Conductivity (W/mK)
   
 
  Ag
 
  Al
 
  Au
 
  Cr
 
  Cu
 
  Mo
 
  Ni
 
  Pb
 
  Pt
 
  Sn
 
  Ti
 
  W
   
 
  Silver
 
  Aluminum
 
  Gold
 
  Chromium
 
  Copper
 
  Molybdenum
 
  Nickel
 
  Lead
 
  Platinum
 
  Tin
 
  Titanium
 
  Tungsten
  300°K
 
  429
 
  237
 
  317
 
  94
 
  401
 
  138
 
  91
 
  36
 
  72
 
  67
 
  23
 
  174
  400°K
 
  425
 
  240
 
  311
 
  91
 
  393
 
  134
 
  80
 
  35
 
  72
 
  62
 
  21
 
  159
  500°K
 
  419
 
  236
 
  304
 
  86
 
  386
 
  130
 
  72
 
  34
 
  72
 
  60
 
  20
 
  146

References:

1. Hulstrom L., Tye R., Smith S., Round Robin Testing of Thermal Conductivity Reference Materials, in Thermal Conductivity, vol.19, Plenum Press, 1988, pp. 199-211.

2.Touloukian Y. et al. (ed.) Thermophysical Properties of Matter, IFI/Plenum, 1970.

3.Beaton C., Hewitt G. (ed.), Physical Property Data for the Design Engineer, Hemisphere, 1989.

Comment